Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Long story short...

1. The movie can be seen in it's entirety here: http://www.imdb.com/video/wab/vi2201067801/ I'm proud of it.

2. I've finished the manuscript for my first novel, and have begun work on #2. More details to come.

3. I've bought the 20th anniversary editions of the oWoD VTM and WTA books. Woot.

4. I'm now working at a law firm.

More updates to come, a helluva lot sooner than the last...

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

More Movie news

Whelp, I'm shooting the movie next week in Adrien MI. It's a single cam 'into the woods' sorta thing. No it's not 'The Blair Witch'. I'm the only chick, though, so that's awesome. :D

Monday, September 5, 2011

So, I bought a new bookshelf and...

I think I might be able to fill it with my horror/sci fi/fantasy books alone. Not sure if that's good or...ah, who am I kidding, it's awesome!

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Hey a movie! Yeah, it's gonna be Terrific, starring everybody...

And me!
It's not 100% sure yet, but in the next few weeks, I'm probably starring in a small independandant horror flick! :D

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Don't be Afraid of the Dark (NO spoilers)

Be freakin' terrified. Or at least, mildly disconcerted.
DbAotD isn't as good as Insidious, but that's a rather high bar to set it againt. It's dark, chilling, and doesn't overuse 'jump' scares. The effects are good, and it's VERY atmouspheric. The actors are passable, espiecally Katie Holms as Sally.

If you enjoyed Del Torros 'Pan's Laberynth', you'll like this. It's dark Fairie Tale motiff is similar, but a lot less confusing. I'd reccomend it for viewing, but I'm not sure about purchase.

One small note: it's a remake of a 1973 ABC TV movie. I was completly unaware of this going in. I've been told the original is better in some ways, so I'm gonna seek that out in the future.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Insidious is

Friday night I saw Insidious with a friend. It was a creepy, effective movie, that was highly reminiscent of Poltergeist--in a good way! I'd recommend it for everyone who enjoys classic haunted house films; although, as the trailer says "It's not the house that's haunted. It's your son."

Spoilers start here! Fairly warned be ye, says I.

The movie's first 30 minutes are the typical slow setup that any horror film uses: The happy family unit, troubled in the past, is looking for a brighter tomorrow in their new house. 2.5 kids, Dad is the sole breadwinner as Mom is trying to write music. It's a happy, boring family.

The usual 'something isn't right here' feelings set in as Dalton (AKA coma kid) explores the attic. Stuff starts moving around and disappearing. All par for the course. This changes when Dalton is very suddenly in a 'coma', and the timeline jumps ahead 3 months. He's at home in a hospital bed, when things start rearing up again: Weird noises on the baby monitor, the parents are fighting, etc.

One of the most effective scares come when the mother checks on the baby, and sees a man behind the window curtain--AFTER about 30 seconds in the room. She notices him just when the audience does, although he's there THE WHOLE TIME.

After that, it really starts flying. The mother is attacked in her room, doors are flung open, and it's getting scarier. Then, the family does something I've never seen before: THEY LEAVE THE HAUNTED HOUSE. We're only about 1/2 way though, and they have the common sense to pack up and go!

Not that that helps. But at least, they're trying.

They move into a new home, and crazy crap is still happening, now with full-on child ghosts, and visions. The dad's mother reports a dream she had where a creepy entity stood over coma kid, wanting him. She gives them the name of an expert she happens to know (BTW, obvious plot point is obvious by now. The Dad's past has something to do with this lady).

Two geek-squad dropouts come in to provide help, and comic relief: one of them is actually the writer of the picture. The see more crazy stuff, and call in the Tangena Baron of the picture. She revels that coma kid isn't in a coma, and the house isn't haunted. It's actually infested with demonic forces and ghosts who want
coma kid's body because his soul is astral projecting somewhere called 'The Furthur', aka limbo. Several drawings in coma kid's room convince the skeptical Dad she's telling the truth, and he consents to let her try a seance.

After donning a WW2 gas mask, Tangena goes into full on seance, with the geek squad in tow. Coma kid tells Tangena that he's trapped, and if they keep talking 'He'll hear them.' The kid gets full on possessed for about five minutes, then goes back into a coma.

Finally, the main murky plot point is revealed: Coma Kid's dad was a gifted astral traveler that was almost possessed by a creepy old lady ghost. His mom knew because she tlook photos of him where the ghost got progressively clearer and closer to him. Tangena and the mom conspired to make him forget his talent, thus keeping him safe. Now, it's all up to him to save his son!

The dad travels into The Further, seeing very chilling specters, and winding up following coma kid's drawings to his location: He's being held in a dungeon by a demon listening to Tiny Tim's 'Tiptoe thru the tulips.' As dumb as it sounds, it's utterly effective and chilling, given that we've heard this song earlier when the new house started being haunted.

The dad rescues Coma kid, who seems none the worse for the wear, but the demon sees them, and they're chased back to the house by EVERY FRIGGAN SPECTER in the flick so far. Once they get back to the house, Coma kid is sent on ahead to his body, while the dad confronts the old lady ghost, yelling "I'm not afraid of you anymore!" She fades away, both men wake up, and the house is clean.

OR IS IT?

Tangena takes a photo of the dad, who loses his shit, and strangles her. The mom, kid, and mother-in-law in the next room hear nothing. The wife eventually senses something amiss, and calls out for the husband. Creepy shit begins once again as she gets to the living room, picks up the camera, and sees the old lady. The dad-old-lady grabs her and says "I'm right here." Cut to the title and loud, clashing music. After the credits, we see the old lady blow out the candle she's been holding through out. Symbolism!

For having a slightly silly explanation, the movie pays off beautifully with a scary finale. I give it a sold 8.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Job market

Whelp, I've walked the stage, and in two to three months, I'll get my degree in the mail. For now, I'm busy applying for jobs. I'm centering my search on jobs at OU--I'd love to be an office assistant, or library aid.

I'm also officially halfway done with my book! I figure at this pace, I should be finished by summer. Here's hoping...

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Graduation fever

Well, it's official: I'm graduating in December with a BA in English (and a history minor). Let the job-hunt begin!

I purchased my cap and gown today ($45), and got a load for free info, including a graduation guide, alumnus packet, and a chaptstick on a key chain (thanks liberty mutual!)

So far, I'm underwhelmed by the process. But the grad party might be fun...

Yes, I'm writing a book!

Since keeping a blog about processes is all the rage now, I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon. Currently, I'm about half finished with my manuscript, nearly 100 pages in. It's a horror fantasy novel, but I'm not comfortable with reporting exactly what it's about just yet. Suffice to say, it's set in modern times, with many of my characters inspired by real people.

I've used a number of websites to help determine what parameters my book should fall into, with the end result of ideally a 20 chapter book, with 3500 words per chapter. As of now, I'm mid-way thru chapter 9, with over 30,000 words written.

I've looked into books about how to get published, but I've read that the Dummies guide is poor. I'm going with the 'Idiots guide' which is apparently the superior book. Who knew?

I tried to find a literary agent for a collection of 101 stories 101 words long that I wrote some time ago, but nothing came of it. As this book wi an actual book, I have higher hopes for it's publishability.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Hollywood has given up.

What do these movies have in common?

A Nightmare on Elm Street
The Crow
The Wizard of Oz
Stephen King's IT
The Evil Dead
Logan's Run
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Child's Play
The Wolf Man
The Tingler
Children of the Corn
Footloose
The Incredible Shrinking Man
Red Sonja
Conan
Labyrinth
The Thing
Short Circuit
Highlander
Jesus Christ Superstar
Hellraiser
Attack of the Killer Tomatoes!
Total Recall
The NeverEnding Story
Frankenstine

They are all being rebooted, remade, or re-imagined. And these aren't even all the movies I found listed on IMDB under the keyword 'Remake'. Now, IMDB has been mistaken before, so the list may not be entirely accurate. Ditto for what's found on Wikipedia, or any other online source. With that said however, if even a third of these remakes ever come to pass, my point will still be proven.

For the most part, the movies on this list are horror movies. Since the nineteen eighties horror movies have mostly been bad, or imported from Asia. There are some exceptions to this rule (Sleepy Hollow comes to mind), but they are few and far between. Hollywood's solution? Remake the hell out of any horror movie you can get your hands on!

To be fair, some of these movies could do with a remake, as the first attempt was abysmal. Red Sonja and Conan fall into this category. With better actors, writers, and effects, these movies could easily be better than the originals. The problem is the fan base. Who is a fan of either Red Sonja or Conan anymore?

In some cases, the original team is working on the remake. I'm a huge fan of the first two Child's Play movies (I even won tickets to see 'Seed of Chucky' premier in Detroit), but if it's going to be remade, why use the same team that did it the first time, including Brad Douriff as the voice of Chucky?
The answer: It's not a re-make, only a glorified special edition with better effects and 'modern' terror (see Chucky commit identity theft! See Andy as a latchkey kid neglected by his single mother!). If all you want to do is release an anniversary special, do that. Don't just make the exact same movie again with better effects and actors. That has worked a total of once in cinema history, and has yet to be repeated (Ah, Evil Dead 2! Neither pure remake or sequel were you).

Some of these just seem bizarre. Footloose is a movie version of the musical play that was based on the non-musical Kevin Bacon film. Got it? This version of 'The Incredible Shinking Man' is said to star Eddie Murphy as a magician who shrinks himself and has to find a cure. Why did they use the title from the original film and book, but have a completely different plot? Why not just title it something else? Here, I'll give you a title: Meet Dave 2.

For the most part, the original movies are classics that should not be remade. The classic monster movies of the nineteen thirties forties and fifties will stand on their own merits, no matter what hollywood produces. But to remake 'A nightmare on Elm Street' is madness. The original cast, crew, and director are still making films! And no matter what the company says, you cannot convince me that Robert Englund suddenly changed his mind about wanting to play Freddy again. That man MADE the role. It would be like casting someone as Dorothy in a Wizard of Oz remake!

Oh, wait. They're doing that. They're remaking 'The Wizard of Oz' as a CGI film. They're also rebooting 'The Crow', a movie that actually killed it's star, Brandon Lee, and basically cemented his acting legacy, ala Heath Ledger's Joker. Wonder how long it'll go before 'The Dark Knight' get's remade. Let's see, at Hollywood's current rate, I'd give it 20 years, at best. So, lets count down to 2028! See an aging Johhny Depp play Alfred! See Rupert Gint as Commissioner Gordon! See the twins Zack and Cody tackle THE JOKER in all his demented glory! See Ledger ROLL OVER IN HIS DAMN GRAVE!

To sum up, at best these films are undeserving of a remake based on the original, and at worse, a sacrilege to the memory of the people who actually created the classic film. I only wish Hollywood would give some independent film makers a chance to do new things. After all, if we don't have new films, what are they going to remake in 20 years?